Frank (Schaeffer’s) talk on faith.

Years ago, in high school I tried to read Francis Schaeffer’s A Christian Manifesto because at the time it was the hot book in evangelical Christian circles. I say “tried” because after reading less than a third of it, I remember being turned off by what I felt at the time was his lack of intelligence and faulty use of logic. Not long after I tossed his book aside I had a brief conversation with a buddy of mine from my church youth group. While discussing Frank Schaeffer, my buddy told me, “he has a son, you know. He writes, but I think he’s trying to get by on his dad’s coattails.”

Fast forward to the present era and needless to say I was quite surprised when I heard Francis Schaeffer’s upstart son Frank had left the conservative Christian fold and struck out on his own.  After writing a series of rather awful Hollywood screenplays, Frank would find greater success as a novelist and memoirist. Currently he writes for the Huffington Post on matters related to politics and religion.  And speaking of religion, just like the late Biblical scholar Jaroslav Pelikan, Schaffer is a convert to the Eastern Orthodox faith.  His current book, Patience with God: Faith for People Who Don’t Like Religion (or Atheism) is Schaeffer’s attempt to find spiritual satisfaction in the middle ground between what he sees as twin dogmatic extremes of atheism and the Christian Right.

Schaeffer’s book is really two books. While espousing a more inclusive and open-ended form of the Christian faith, (and in his opinion more representative of the spirit of the early Christian church), in the first half of his book Schaeffer criticizes the “new” atheists of Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins for what he sees as their dogmatic, mean-spirited and close-minded arguments. Some of Schaeffer’s points are valid- Harris, although I admire him for his almost singular ability to make pithy and powerful arguments regarding the abuses of religion, can be abrasive. Dawkins at times does come across as know it all. And while I enjoyed Hitchen’s book God is Not Great, as a person, he’ s a bit of an ass. On the other hand, Schaeffer speaks rather well of atheist Daniel Dennett, while not agreeing with his arguments, Schaefer admires him for the respectful and civil tone of his writing.

After taking the new atheists to task, Schaeffer turns his sights of the Christian Right. Being a former member of their fold, (according to Schaeffer, his decision to leave cost him a 75 per cent drop in income due to his loss in salaries, speaker’s fees and future royalties), he’s quite familiar with the inner workings of their world. Rick Warren, Tim LaHayes and Franklin Graham, (son of Billy Graham) are all taken to task for their respective hypocrisies and shortcomings. According to Schaeffer, their versions of Christianity have more to do with American-style mass consumerism and bear little resemblance to the more spiritual and inclusive faith practiced by the early Christians.

The second part of the book which is mostly autobiographical, might be the weakest. While I enjoyed reading about his childhood experiences in rural Switzerland and an English boarding school, much of the material could have safely been edited out. In addition, some readers will criticize Schaeffer’s efforts to find God or spiritual purpose in the beauty of everyday earthly experiences such as babysitting his infant granddaughter, reuniting with his son after his tour of Afghanistan or spending the day with his wife at a wonderous art gallery in New York. Such readers might question if we can attribute the personal satisfaction we derive from such experiences to the existence of God or some other spiritual being or higher purpose.

For its slight shortcomings, I enjoyed much of Schaeffer’s book.  While it’s not the best book on religion I’ve read recently, I liked his attempt to stake out a sort of middle ground between the two opposing intellectual and spiritual worlds.



Filed under Agnostic/Atheist/Skeptic, Christianity

6 responses to “Frank (Schaeffer’s) talk on faith.

  1. Great review. The first part of the book does sound much better than the second part – I would think it would weaken the first half to include the second half as part of the same book. Might it probably work better as two books?

    • Thanks ! I’m also wondering if the material in the second part could have been bundled into a totally separate book. Or he could have cut much of the material and still made his points.

  2. This does sound like an interesting book. I actually left church some years ago (it’s probably around 5 years ago or so) because I was tired of what the church has become. It’s become so political and backwards with respect to women that I finally just got fed up. This might be an interesting read for me, but it almost looks like there might be other books with the same subject matter that might be better? I’ll keep this one in the back of my mind.

    • Carin, if you are interested, I can email you a reading list of books which in light of your personal history, you might find helpful.
      Just let me know, or if I can remember I will try to send you an email myself.
      Thanks for dropping by !

  3. Thanks for this review, Maphead. I’m an early fan of the older Schaeffer. However, as I’ve tried to read him recently, I have been pretty surprised by how bad it is. Anything written by the dude who wore knickers, started a commune, and still managed to speak at Moody Bible Institute from time to time is regarded as something akin to the bearer of the holy grail by the evangelical Christians that know who he is. “Franky”, from my recollection of his book, Addicted to Mediocrity, had some good ideas but couldn’t write worth crap. I’m glad to hear he’s grown, but I’m also not surprised that his self-absorption is tied into his religious understanding. We evangelicals are so tied to the “personal experience” that we balk at someone else’s which aren’t like ours or at the folks who don’t value personal experience at all when it comes to faith. Interestingly, I see a parallel to this type of thinking when considering the current “Tea Party” movement. One candidate recently said he is committed to “our borders, our language, and our culture”. My guess is he assumes that any white guy, such as him or me, would have the same attitude because we share the same “culture”. He takes his very personal idea of how things are and shoves it out there to those he assumes are like him. And he has little desire to dialogue with anybody else. It’s a shame, but it sure makes things easy. Ahh. I feel better now. Great review!

    • Fool ! Where have you been ??!! Been too long. Good to see you !
      Thanks for the kind words and above all, thanks for sharing your insights.
      Don’t be a stranger ! See you around !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s